STONE LAW FIRM, LLC
CONSUMER BANKRUPTCY
ABOUT US

DANIEL STONE is an attorney at the Stone Law Firm, where he primarily handles consumer bankruptcy cases. He earned his B.A. degree from the University of South Carolina, his J.D. degree from Washburn Law School in Topeka, Kansas, and a Certificate of Japanese Comparative Law from Temple Law School, Tokyo Campus. Mr. Stone is a member of the South Carolina Bankruptcy Law Association, was appointed to the Bankruptcy Interest Rate Committee and is active with the Bankruptcy Court's Care Program that teaches students credit education. He has been an elected committee member of the South Carolina Bankruptcy Law Association (2007-2009), and has served as a presenter on consumer bankruptcy issues for Continuing Legal Education in South Carolina (NBI  2009 and 2010 conferences).

RECENT CONTESTED BANKRUPTCY CASES:


In re Jones; C/A 09-02815-jw (03/31/2010)*non published

In re Williams; C/A 09-05120-dd (10/28/2009) * non published
In re Dumas; C/A 08-03712-dd           (07/31/2008)

In re Macon; C/A 07-03041-hb          (10/19/2007)

In re Workman; C/A 06-04543-jw (07/31/2007)

In re Poole; C/A 14839-hb                  (06/18/2007)

In re Gartman; C/A 06-05307-jw     (03/30/2007)

In re Camacho; C/A 05-14804-jw     (01/10/2006)

In re Arsi; C/A 06-04092-dd              (11/01/2006)


MOTION TO EXTEND CASES

Attorney has filed close to 55  Extend the Stay Motions since January, 2006

Attorney has at least 3 Motions to Extend that were granted and published                    (In re Davis, In re McWhite)

Attorney has filed at least one Motion to Reconsider a denial of a Motion to Extend. Motion was granted (In re Martin) 

Attorney has not had one case denied or not confirmed by the Court where the debtor(s) pursued their cases. Note, attorney has had one or two cases that were denied and the clients gave up on their case.


RECENT ADVERSARY CASES

2009

Attorney has filed 4 adversary cases in 2009

- One case involved a house that was up for sale by the County post-petition. A percentage of the claim had been discharged in a prior bankruptcy. A settlement with the County is in the works and the debtor will be able to save her house.


2010

Debtor settled a 362 dispute with mortgage company for $5,000 on 04/21/2010

 

Web Hosting Companies